Sunday, May 03, 2009

ALL aviation news from India: Aviation India Blog
DGCA raps Kingfisher airlines for directive misuse
New Delhi: The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) has given a ray of hope to pilots by rapping the knuckles of Kingfisher Airlines for misusing one of its directives. In fact, it could put other airline managements on the mat too for reducing pilot salaries arbitrarily, but refusing to allow them to leave for greener pastures.
A DGCA letter, dated April 24, 2009, to Kingfisher says it was reacting to information it had received that the airline was insisting pilots serve them for six months on reduced salary since it is a DGCA rule.
But the letter, which TOI has a copy of, informs the airline categorically, "This CAR (civil aviation requirement) on notice period shall not be made applicable on matters wherein terms and conditions of employment have been altered/amended and there is a dispute in employer-employee relationship. Such disputes may be settled in the appropriate court of law."
And that's precisely what Kingfisher and some other airlines have been doing reducing salaries, and perks of pilots and informing them simply via email. Flying hours too were reduced from 80-85 hours monthly to 55-50 hours as leased planes were sent back. "Recession was a valid reason, but that was no excuse for preventing us from leaving for better prospects," says a pilot.
The letter also informed Kingfisher that "the provisions of this CAR, Section 7, Series X, shall only be applicable wherein resignations by pilots result in cancellation of flights causing inconvenience to passengers and where such action holds the airline to ransom."
Meanwhile, Kingfishers spokesman Prakash Mirpuri, said, "We have taken note of the DGCA ruling and shall deal with the pilots who have resigned accordingly."
That CAR, incidentally, was imposed in 2005 and made it mandatory for pilots to serve a six-month notice period before quitting an airline to join another, unless the airline employing them gave a No Objection Certificate. The CAR was made when there was a severe shortage of pilots and was ostensibly meant to help passengers who were left in the lurch due to last-minute flight cancellations due to absentee pilots. However, with the present glut of pilots, mainly co-pilots, this CAR made no sense.
02/05/09 Shobha John/Times of India
To read the news in full |
PermaLink A DGCA letter, dated April 24, 2009, to Kingfisher says it was reacting to information it had received that the airline was insisting pilots serve them for six months on reduced salary since it is a DGCA rule.
But the letter, which TOI has a copy of, informs the airline categorically, "This CAR (civil aviation requirement) on notice period shall not be made applicable on matters wherein terms and conditions of employment have been altered/amended and there is a dispute in employer-employee relationship. Such disputes may be settled in the appropriate court of law."
And that's precisely what Kingfisher and some other airlines have been doing reducing salaries, and perks of pilots and informing them simply via email. Flying hours too were reduced from 80-85 hours monthly to 55-50 hours as leased planes were sent back. "Recession was a valid reason, but that was no excuse for preventing us from leaving for better prospects," says a pilot.
The letter also informed Kingfisher that "the provisions of this CAR, Section 7, Series X, shall only be applicable wherein resignations by pilots result in cancellation of flights causing inconvenience to passengers and where such action holds the airline to ransom."
Meanwhile, Kingfishers spokesman Prakash Mirpuri, said, "We have taken note of the DGCA ruling and shall deal with the pilots who have resigned accordingly."
That CAR, incidentally, was imposed in 2005 and made it mandatory for pilots to serve a six-month notice period before quitting an airline to join another, unless the airline employing them gave a No Objection Certificate. The CAR was made when there was a severe shortage of pilots and was ostensibly meant to help passengers who were left in the lurch due to last-minute flight cancellations due to absentee pilots. However, with the present glut of pilots, mainly co-pilots, this CAR made no sense.
02/05/09 Shobha John/Times of India
The place for general discussion, feedback and questions Readers Forum
Archives
-
February 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
- June 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- January 2009
- February 2009
- March 2009
- April 2009
- May 2009
- June 2009
- July 2009
- August 2009
- September 2009
- October 2009
- November 2009
- December 2009
- January 2010
- February 2010
- March 2010
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September(Upto 25) 2006

